in the jury are ready to get life back to normal. Jurors may be tempted to reach a quick verdict in order to get it over with and go home. Firstly, as the selection for jury service (governed by section 1 of the Juries Act 1974 as amended by the Criminal Justice Act 1988) is totally down to chance, there is the realistic possibility that incompetent people, who are unable to deal with the court. Most jurors dont have a background in law. Later, Henry II changed the function of jury to one who deliberates on evidence. It is very time consuming. Can become bored during the trial. The lay assessors would be selected the same way as jurors; however the amount of public participation would dramatically decrease. If one person is rendering a judgment, it is much easier to question their authority to make that decision. Justice is seen to be done as members of the public are involved in a key role and the whole process is public. The case on Ward v James (1966) established that juries will only be used in exceptional circumstances the case of H v Ministry of Defence (1991) further reinforced this rule.
Are mislead by barristers techniques as to strength of evidence. Cite This Essay, to export a reference to this article persuasive essays contraception please select a referencing style below: All Answers ltd, 'The jury is an essential part of the legal system' (t, October 2018) p?vref1 accessed Reference Copied to Clipboard. Incorrect acquittals due to jury nobbling. No investigation into the juries deliberations, even if a juror alleges inappropriate behaviour by other jurors. A third advantage is that the jurors are totally impartial and the decision is made purely on opinion. In very exceptional cases a jury can be used in personal injury cases. Slowly, the jury system mold into the system we have today. . There may be bias jurors who will purposely make an unfair decision. There are many alternatives to a jury one being that of a single judge. In these cases a judge of character isnt necessary so there is no need for a trail. This keeps some public contribution, yet loses the time and cost of using a jury: because of this, this method is thought of as the most adequate alternative.
What are the Advantages and Disadvantages of a Jury Trial?
Iese spain essays
Sexual orientation essay conclusion